It looks like the Anti-Gun lobby won a major, MAJOR victory for Gun Control under the PNoy Administration. One big problem with PNoy is that his financial backers, among them the rich and powerful Ayala clan, have Anti-Gun sentiments. In fact, rumors has it that Anti-Gun Advocates like Nandy Pacheco and his group has been pestering the Administration for tighter gun control laws as soon as he first stepped into office.
Now it looks like they finally got their wish thru the Administration's allies in the legislature, who has come up with the with the "Comprehensive Firearms and Ammunition Regulation Act Senate Bill No. 3397". Here is a direct link to a copy of the law itself in full for everyone's reference: http://www.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/1507312687!.pdf
While everyone was talking and arguing about the Reproductive Health (RH) and Cyber Crime Bills, it seems the legislature quietly worked on this bill and got under everybody's radar as it has now PASSED BOTH houses as of February 5, 2013. There was NO NEWS of President Aquino vetoing this bill, so I ASSUME that this has NOW PASSED INTO LAW as our laws states that any bill passed by both houses and not vetoed after 30 days automatically becomes law. 30 days after February 5, 2013 was March 7, 2013, or around 2 months ago.
Friday, May 17, 2013
Sunday, April 28, 2013
My Review of the KCI 31-round .40 caliber Magazine
The highest capacity magazines in .40 Caliber that Glock offers is only 22 rounds, so if you are looking for more than that you will need to at other manufacturers like KCI and their 31-round magazines. I got mine from a local source for only P2,500, much cheaper than the high-capacity magazines sold by Glock.
'Appearance and Finish'
The magazine's finish initially looks good, but if you look closer, you will see evidence of flashes on some areas. The material also seems to be different, or at least the "blend" is different compared to the original Glock Magazines. The Glock magazines have somewhat lighter, almost grayish color, while these magazines have a semi-gloss black color.
Appearance-wise, the main difference this magazine has compared to the factory magazine is the checkering on the sides of the magazines on the area starting from the bottom of the magazine well to the baseplate. I don't really like them that much, it sort of makes the magazine look a bit cheap. In terms of overall appearance, I prefer and find the factory Glock magazines to be better aesthetically.
'Appearance and Finish'
The magazine's finish initially looks good, but if you look closer, you will see evidence of flashes on some areas. The material also seems to be different, or at least the "blend" is different compared to the original Glock Magazines. The Glock magazines have somewhat lighter, almost grayish color, while these magazines have a semi-gloss black color.
Appearance-wise, the main difference this magazine has compared to the factory magazine is the checkering on the sides of the magazines on the area starting from the bottom of the magazine well to the baseplate. I don't really like them that much, it sort of makes the magazine look a bit cheap. In terms of overall appearance, I prefer and find the factory Glock magazines to be better aesthetically.
Monday, April 15, 2013
Gun Envy: Tracking Point's Precision Guided Firearms
I was hit with another case of Gun Envy when I read that a company named "Tracking Point" has just announced a new class of firearms it calls "Precision Guided Firearms (PGF)". In simplest terms, these are basically firearms made to function similar to a video game. For more detailed information about these PGFs, refer to this excellently written article: Bullseye from 1,000 yards: Shooting the $17,000 Linux-powered rifle
I am just going to give my personal opinions, observations and views about these firearms as the above article already covered the technical details comprehensively. There has been similar systems in place over the years, I recall seeing one on the Discovery Channel's "Future Weapons" episode, for example, but none has been able to integrate digital technology to firearms as seamlessly and as smoothly as this one.
'Longbow and Crossbow Similarity'
The invention of these PGFs remind me of the history of the Longbow and the Crossbow. Longbows were THE penultimate range weapons in its day, but it had one main drawback, and that is was is difficult to master. The strings were hard to pull back, and as if that was not enough, you have to hold the weapon in tension as you aim it, before releasing it to its target.
I am just going to give my personal opinions, observations and views about these firearms as the above article already covered the technical details comprehensively. There has been similar systems in place over the years, I recall seeing one on the Discovery Channel's "Future Weapons" episode, for example, but none has been able to integrate digital technology to firearms as seamlessly and as smoothly as this one.
'Longbow and Crossbow Similarity'
The invention of these PGFs remind me of the history of the Longbow and the Crossbow. Longbows were THE penultimate range weapons in its day, but it had one main drawback, and that is was is difficult to master. The strings were hard to pull back, and as if that was not enough, you have to hold the weapon in tension as you aim it, before releasing it to its target.
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
My Review of the Fab Defense FGG-S-K
'Model Confusion'
Before anything else, let me just warn everyone that I find the details for the FGG-S-K to be highly confusing. I bought the grip from the Zahal.org website, and there the model description is the "FGG-S-K", but the actual product in picture is actually the "FGG-K" (click on the link below to access the page):- http://www.zahal.org/products/tactical-expandable-folding-grip
"FGG-K" I presume means "Folding Grip Glock - KPOS" because it is used mainly with the KPOS Carbine Conversion Kits that Fab Defense also sells. The difference between the "FGG-S-K" and the "FGG-K" is that the former has a protrusion that allows it to index to the lower side of the frame and the front of the trigger guard. The "FGG-K" lacks this feature, and looks "cleaner" in appearance.
I also have a hard time finding any official and direct reference to the "FGG-S-K", even from the Fab Defense website, or its sister companies (CAA Tactical and Mako Group). So right now, I don't even know exactly what "FGG-S-K" stands for. I like products from Fab Defense, I have used a lot of it on my Glock, and they have all been quite satisfactory. So it sorts of mystifies me as to why they end up with a mess like this.
Saturday, March 2, 2013
My Review of the Aimtech APM-1 Glock Mount Part One
'Optic Sight Mount Selection'
There are about a dozen or so different designs from different manufacturers of Optic Sight Mounts for Glock Pistols, but I decided on the Aimtech APM-1 Mount as my preferred one for a number of reasons. The first and main reason is that it is a STATIC mount, meaning it is independent of the movement of the slide. The previous mount I used for my Burris Fast Fire 3 was a Slide Mount, but over time I discovered some issues with that type of mount after firing a couple of hundred rounds in full auto with it. I plan to discuss this more in detail at a future date somewhere in my blog, but suffice to say for now I decided to use one that would not require the FF3 to be mounted on top of the slide itself.
The second reason is the fact that it leaves the Glock's frame rails free for use with other accessories. Most Glock Optic Mount designs use the frame rails to anchor on to, but I use Vertical Front Grips (VFGs) on my Glock, hence I wanted that rail free. Some mounts that use the rail also allow VFGs to be mounted on them, but I found these to be ineffective (again, further discussion on my blog at a future date). The APM-1 uses the Trigger Pin and Trigger Housing Pin to anchor on to, leaving the rails free for use.
The third reason is that it anchors itself to two points (as mentioned earlier), making for a much more secure attachment. Be careful of using mounts that secure itself to only one point (i.e., like those using the Frame Rails only) as they are less secure and will likely tend to move around during actual firing and/or handling. Here is a close look at the mounting pins as they are attached to the frame.
There are about a dozen or so different designs from different manufacturers of Optic Sight Mounts for Glock Pistols, but I decided on the Aimtech APM-1 Mount as my preferred one for a number of reasons. The first and main reason is that it is a STATIC mount, meaning it is independent of the movement of the slide. The previous mount I used for my Burris Fast Fire 3 was a Slide Mount, but over time I discovered some issues with that type of mount after firing a couple of hundred rounds in full auto with it. I plan to discuss this more in detail at a future date somewhere in my blog, but suffice to say for now I decided to use one that would not require the FF3 to be mounted on top of the slide itself.
The second reason is the fact that it leaves the Glock's frame rails free for use with other accessories. Most Glock Optic Mount designs use the frame rails to anchor on to, but I use Vertical Front Grips (VFGs) on my Glock, hence I wanted that rail free. Some mounts that use the rail also allow VFGs to be mounted on them, but I found these to be ineffective (again, further discussion on my blog at a future date). The APM-1 uses the Trigger Pin and Trigger Housing Pin to anchor on to, leaving the rails free for use.
The third reason is that it anchors itself to two points (as mentioned earlier), making for a much more secure attachment. Be careful of using mounts that secure itself to only one point (i.e., like those using the Frame Rails only) as they are less secure and will likely tend to move around during actual firing and/or handling. Here is a close look at the mounting pins as they are attached to the frame.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
My First Encounter with the .22 TCM
I was doing some shooting at our local shooting range with some acquaintances a day before the Election Gun Ban, when suddenly I hear these faint, booming sounds thru my protective ear piece, coupled with concussion on my chest from the adjoining bay.
"Oh, good", I thought, someone is shooting a .44 Magnum caliber firearm. So I turn around to look. That's when I found something strange - The shooter was using a 1911 pistol, and as far as I know, the .44 Magnum has not been chambered for a 1911 pistol. Various confusing thoughts crossed my mind, like, could it possibly be some sort of new version of a Wildey I don't know about yet? Or a Coonan?
Then I looked at the target paper, and there were small holes in it, and from that I figured, large fireball, concussive sound, but small caliber, "Ah, the (in)famous .22 TCM" round.
"Oh, good", I thought, someone is shooting a .44 Magnum caliber firearm. So I turn around to look. That's when I found something strange - The shooter was using a 1911 pistol, and as far as I know, the .44 Magnum has not been chambered for a 1911 pistol. Various confusing thoughts crossed my mind, like, could it possibly be some sort of new version of a Wildey I don't know about yet? Or a Coonan?
Then I looked at the target paper, and there were small holes in it, and from that I figured, large fireball, concussive sound, but small caliber, "Ah, the (in)famous .22 TCM" round.
Thursday, January 24, 2013
Gun Envy: Grand Power K105R Machine Pistol
I was going around Youtube when I came across this video of a little known, modern Machine Pistol: The Grand Power K105R
I was immediately hit with an extreme case of Gun Envy, mainly because of the gun's controllability at full-auto, shot in FREE HAND (i.e., no Forward Vertical Grip, no Shoulder Stock, etc.). Having some experience with shooting my Glock 22 in full auto mode, I knew this was something special.
Despite the adding a Shoulder Stock, Vertical Grip and DPM Recoil Reduction System, the Glock 22's recoil at full auto is still relatively considerable, definitely not anywhere near that of a full-pledged Sub Machine Gun. So when I saw the K105R in full auto at freehand with low recoil, I thought, wow, this is something I've always wanted my Glock 22 to be as a Machine Pistol, but which I could not do.
Despite the adding a Shoulder Stock, Vertical Grip and DPM Recoil Reduction System, the Glock 22's recoil at full auto is still relatively considerable, definitely not anywhere near that of a full-pledged Sub Machine Gun. So when I saw the K105R in full auto at freehand with low recoil, I thought, wow, this is something I've always wanted my Glock 22 to be as a Machine Pistol, but which I could not do.
Monday, January 7, 2013
Using Light Striker Springs on Glocks
- Original posted January 6, 2013
- Updated January 19, 2013, add note on use of lightened and extended Strikers
-------------------
In an effort to lighten the trigger of my Glock 22, I have been using a lighter Striker Spring on the unit for the last couple of months, and I just found out lately that using such results in a long-term reliability issue, as I will explain in detail.
'Light Striker Spring'
To lighten the trigger pull of a Glock, there are a couple of ways you can do so, and all involves a simple replacement of parts. You can lighten the Trigger Connector to the most common 3.5 lbs. from the standard 5 lbs; You can also lighten the Safety Plunger Spring. However, the one that will result in the biggest improvement in trigger weight is the use of lighter Striker Springs.
'Light Striker Spring'
To lighten the trigger pull of a Glock, there are a couple of ways you can do so, and all involves a simple replacement of parts. You can lighten the Trigger Connector to the most common 3.5 lbs. from the standard 5 lbs; You can also lighten the Safety Plunger Spring. However, the one that will result in the biggest improvement in trigger weight is the use of lighter Striker Springs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
I decided to write a long piece about Lone Wolf Distributors' (LWD) barrels for Glock, when I noticed that wrong information about these...
-
'Model Confusion' Before anything else, let me just warn everyone that I find the details for the FGG-S-K to be highly confusing. I...
-
Here is the second video I made of my Glock 22 in its "Machine Pistol" Mode. I used a small Tri-pod this time, and the focus and ...
-
I have completed the second assembly for my M4-Based SBR build, and it is the Upper Receiver Assembly. Total price was at Php 22,466 (approx...
-
The third assembly or system I have completed on my M4-Based SBR build is the sighting system. Rifles will be largely useless without a sigh...
-
Update History: - Original posted June 17, 2012 - Updated January 29, 2013, add comparative picture with and without DPM System ——————- Afte...